{"id":257,"date":"2023-01-09T14:04:17","date_gmt":"2023-01-09T13:04:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.uni-siegen.de\/modernentrepreneurship\/?p=257"},"modified":"2023-03-02T08:21:14","modified_gmt":"2023-03-02T07:21:14","slug":"lets-add-the-land-of-the-pandas-to-our-research-agenda-why-female-entrepreneurship-in-china-matters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.uni-siegen.de\/modernentrepreneurship\/2023\/01\/09\/lets-add-the-land-of-the-pandas-to-our-research-agenda-why-female-entrepreneurship-in-china-matters\/","title":{"rendered":"Let’s add the land of the pandas to our research agenda. Why female entrepreneurship in China matters."},"content":{"rendered":"

Anna-Katharina Schaper,\u00a0doctoral candidate, Chair of China Business and Economics, University\u00a0of W\u00fcrzburg and external doctoral student at the Professorship of Business Administration, in particular of SME Management and Entrepreneurship, University of Siegen.<\/p>\n

Contact: anna-katharina.schaper@uni-wuerzburg.de<\/a><\/p>\n

Abstract<\/h2>\n

Entrepreneurship in China, particularly from a gender perspective, is an underexplored research field. Does scarcity of research on China imply that China is not a relevant case for entrepreneurship scholars and practitioners? Does private entrepreneurship in China matter after all? Should we stay on the course of investigating entrepreneurship activities in conventional environments, like the US and its Silicon Valley? Or is it about time to calibrate our research focus and turn to studying entrepreneurial activities in less explored contexts? To answer these questions, this article provides a quick overview of the history of the Chinese private sector and offers an analysis of the status quo of the Chinese entrepreneurship landscape. Additionally, the article uses a gender-lens to shed light on entrepreneurial endeavors of Chinese women entrepreneurs. <\/p>\n

Traveling into the past: a quick overview of the historical development of private entrepreneurship in China<\/h2>\n

When the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) came to power in 1949, the government gradually suppressed and forbid private entrepreneurship (Ahlstrom and Ding, 2014). Guided by a system of \u2018state capitalism\u2019, the government transformed private firms into state-private cooperatives in the early 1950s, merged individual handicraft businesses to larger cooperatives as well as transformed them into local, state or commune factories. However, after the Great Leap Forward (1958\u20131959), the Chinese government eased their restrictions regarding individual small and individual handicraft businesses and allowed them to operate again. Nevertheless, a few years later, small businesses were again forbidden during the Cultural Revolution (1966\u20131976) (Garnaut et al., 2012). Within two decades, the political environment transformed China\u2019s economic system, with the economy system now relying on its state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and collectively owned enterprises at the local level.<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 In December 1978, the initiated opening-up reforms laid the foundation for a step-by-step re-introduction of the private sector as well as for a once again changing economic path (Nie et al., 2009). In the beginning of the reform period, private entrepreneurship was limited to sole proprietorships, so-called \u2018getihu\u2019 \uff08\u4e2a\u4f53\u6237), which were only allowed to employ a maximum of seven people. It took until June 1988 to formally introduce the private sector by issuing the \u2018Tentative Stipulations on Private Enterprises (TSPE)\u2019. The TSPE enabled enterprises to hire more than seven people and therefore to officially operate and grow private businesses, the so-called \u2018siying qiye\u2019 (\u79c1\u8425\u4f01\u4e1a) (Garnaut et al., 2012).<\/p>\n

With the slogan of \u201cgrasp the large, let go of the small (\u6293\u5927\u653e\u5c0f)\u201d, the Chinese government acted upon inefficiencies in its state sector and initiated a wave of SOE reforms and privatization measures in the 1990s (Lardy, 2014). Meanwhile, China\u2019s economy grew at a rapid pace, with double-digit growth rates being the norm until the early 2000s (see World Bank 2022 database). Regarding economic growth, the private sector became a more and more important driver of economic growth. Nevertheless, China\u2019s economy grew on a slower pace starting from the 2010s. XI Jinping (President of the People\u2019s Republic of China and General Secretary of the CCP) referred to this as the \u2018New Normal\u2019, an economic system relying on a more sustainable growth model (Dittmer, 2017). In this regard, the government aimed to change its growth model from being the \u2018workbench of the world\u2019 (low-tech and labor-intensive manufacturing sector) to being an innovation and manufacturing powerhouse. This is mirrored also in the introduction of the Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation Strategy (2014) and the \u2018Made in China 2025 strategy\u2019 (2015).<\/p>\n

The journey of China\u2019s private sector is for several reasons, quite remarkable. First, private-owned enterprises clearly outnumber state-owned enterprises nowadays. In 2020, 25.055,456 companies were registered in China, with 91.11 percent (22.835,565) of these being private-owned enterprises. In contrast, only 0.03 percent (82,155) of China\u2019s enterprises being SOEs. All other enterprise types (such as foreign enterprises and collective enterprises) accounted for 2.219,891 enterprises and made up for 8.86 percent (National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2021). Second, the private sector has become the driving force and backbone of the Chinese economic system. It nowadays contributes to more than 50 percent of tax revenue, 60 percent of the economy\u2019s GDP, 70 percent of technological innovation, 80 percent of urban employment and 90 percent of new created employment (The State Council of the People\u2019s Republic of China, 2018). Scholars and newspapers even referred to this as the 50\/60\/70\/80\/90 rule of private entrepreneurship in China (e.g., Zitelmann, 2019).<\/p>\n

However, the relatively few Chinese SOEs contribute to roughly 30 percent of the nation\u2019s GDP (Zhang, 2019) and are giants in the world of business. Examples can be found in the Fortune Global 500 Ranking. The Fortune Global 500 are the biggest companies in the world in terms of revenue. In August 2020, Fortune titled the following headline \u201cThe Fortune Global 500 is now more Chinese than American\u201c (Murray and Meyer, 2020). For the first time in its history, the number of Chinese companies included in the Fortune Global 500 surpassed the number of US-American companies. The 2022 Fortune Global 500 ranking includes 136 Chinese companies versus 124 US-American companies, with Walmart and Amazon from the US leading the ranking and three Chinese companies following in the Top 5 of the world\u2019s biggest companies: State Grid, China National Petroleum, and the Sinopec Group (Fortune, 2022). All Chinese companies included in the Top 5 of the world\u2019s biggest companies are state-owned. In this regard, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) analyzed the ownership structure of the 136 Chinese companies included in the ranking and found 29 POEs versus 71 SOEs (Mei, 2022). This means that in terms of revenue, China\u2019s biggest companies are SOEs. However, private companies such as JD.com (#46), Tencent (#121), and BYD (#436) are included in the ranking of the biggest companies in the world (Fortune, 2022).<\/p>\n

In the last years, China\u2019s entrepreneurs needed to navigate turbulent times. First, increased government intervention caused insecurity among entrepreneurs. One example to be named is China\u2019s tech crackdown, which started in 2020 and is still ongoing. For instance, regulators limited the time children are allowed on playing computer games and banned private tutoring services (Reuters, 2021a). The regulations impacted China\u2019s education (tech) industry as well as its gaming industry tremendously. On top of that, COVID-19 and China\u2019s zero-COVID strategy, slowed the economic down. Current predictions show a GDP growth rate of 4.4 percent in 2022 and an expected rebound of the economy of 4.9 percent in 2023 (OECD, 2022). This is well below the GDP growth rates of previous years in China.<\/p>\n

Dreaming of unicorns: creating entrepreneurship hubs<\/h2>\n

Becoming a powerhouse for innovation and entrepreneurship was on top of the government\u2019s agenda in the past years. The \u2018Made in China 2025\u2019 and \u2018Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation\u2019 strategy are key puzzle pieces in achieving this goal.<\/p>\n

The Made in China 2025 (MIC) was announced by China\u2019s State Council in May 2015. MIC is a three-step plan, with targets set to be achieved in 2025, 2045 and 2049. Contrary to what the name, the strategy does not conclude in 2025, it key goals are planned to be achieved in 2049. The year 2049 marks an important milestone for the CCP, since it is the 100th anniversary of the founding of the PRC. As a result, China aims to be a \u2018leading manufacturing superpower\u2019 until this historic event. This means that in 2049, the PRC leads global manufacturing and innovation and is competitive in advanced technologies (Zenglein and Holzmann, 2019). To achieve this, the strategy promotes innovation-driven economic growth, particularly by supporting ten core industries: 1) \u2018Next-generation IT\u2019, 2) \u2018High-end computerized machines and robots\u2019, 3) \u2018Aviation and space equipment, 4) \u2018Maritime engineering equipment and high-tech ships\u2019, 5) Advanced transportation equipment\u2019, 6) Energy-saving and new energy vehicles, 7) \u2018Energy equipment\u2019, 8) \u2018Agricultural equipment\u2019, 9) \u2018New materials\u2019, 10) \u2018Biomedicine and high-performance medical equipment\u2019 (Zenglein and Holzmann, 2019, p. 20). As part of this support, MIC 2025 offers massive funding opportunities for POEs and SOEs.<\/p>\n

China\u2019s Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation Strategy (\u5927\u4f17\u521b\u4e1a\u4e07\u4f17\u521b\u65b0\u653f\u7b56) was announced by the former Premier of the State Council, LI Keqiang at the Summer Davos Forum in Tianjin in 2014. The Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation Strategy can be characterized by three key goals: 1) Create employment, 2) Create an entrepreneurial spirit, 3) Foster economic growth and innovation (The State Council of the People\u2019s Republic of China, 2015). Since 2015, the Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation Week takes place every year in a Chinese city. The first Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation Week (\u5168\u56fd\u5927\u4f17\u521b\u4e1a\u4e07\u4f17\u521b\u65b0\u6d3b\u52a8\u5468)was organized in Beijing (2015), followed by Beijing and Shenzhen (2016), Shenzhen (2017), Chengdu (2018), Shanghai (2019), Beijing (2021), Zhengzhou (2021) and Hefei (2022) (Ecns.cn, 2016; National Eastern Tech-Transfer Center, 2019; State Council of the People\u2019s Republic of China, 2022; Xinhua, 2018 and 2020). This entrepreneurship week city list shows that the entrepreneurship week was first held in China\u2019s first-tier cities and subsequently also moved to China\u2019s emerging mega cities in Southwestern and East central China. This shows that the promotion of entrepreneurship and innovation is not exclusively targeting first-tier cities. The idea of mass entrepreneurship and innovation is set to spread across the whole nation.<\/p>\n

In a study, Gao and Mu (2021) reflect on the successes of the strategy and emphasize that since its announcement, more private business and unicorn start-ups emerged than before. A unicorn company can be defined as \u201c<\/span>a private company with a valuation over USD one billion<\/span>\u201d<\/span> (CB Insights, 2022<\/span>, n. p.<\/span>)<\/span>. Unicorn companies have not filed for an IPO yet and are therefore not registered at a stock market. <\/span>Due to their degree of innovation and potential to contribute to economic growth and job creation, governments seek to nurture unicorns as part of their entrepreneurship ecosystem. Such efforts of China\u2019s dream of creating unicorn hubs could be seen at the 2018 National Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation Week in Chengdu, Sichuan province (see Photo 1 and 2). Chengdu is the capital of Sichuan province and is a mega city in Southwestern China. Chengdu is particularly renowned for two things: Spicy food and pandas. On Photo 3, you can see Chengdu\u2019s most loved mascot, pandas, jointly exercising with a unicorn. How does this fit into China\u2019s entrepreneurship strategy? We can interpret this arrangement as unicorns being part of Chengdu\u2019s and China\u2019s entrepreneurship environment. Thus, the unicorn is as an illustration of China\u2019s eagerness to create innovative start-ups that eventually become innovative unicorns. Therefore, the government seeks to creating an environment where you can spot unicorns in real-life and not as mythical creatures as they are.<\/span><\/p>\n

Photo 1<\/strong>\u2013<\/strong>2.<\/strong> Location of the 2018 National Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation Week in Chengdu, Sichuan province, China<\/p>\n

\"\"\"\"<\/p>\n

Photo credit<\/em>: Anna-Katharina Schaper (March 2019).<\/p>\n

Photo 3.<\/strong> Pandas and a Unicorn at the 2018 National Mass\u00a0Entrepreneurship and Innovation Week in Chengdu,\u00a0Sichuan Province, China<\/p>\n

\"\"\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

Photo credit<\/em>: Anna-Katharina Schaper (March 2019)<\/p>\n

The world is currently home to 1,197 unicorns (see CB Insights unicorn data, 10\/21\/2022). So, how is China\u2019s unicorn mission going? More than half of all unicorns are located in the United States (n = 646), with China coming second in the unicorn ranking with one out of eight of all unicorns (n = 172), followed by India (n = 70), the United Kingdom (n = 47), Germany (n = 29), and Israel (n = 22). In total, all European Union member countries are home to 100 unicorns. In China, unicorns can be found in 19 cities, with 82.5 percent of all unicorns located in Beijing (n = 62), Shanghai (n = 44), Shenzhen (n = 20), and Hangzhou (n =16) (CB Insights unicorn data, 10\/21\/2022).<\/p>\n

These start-up ecosystems of Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Hangzhou are not only the home of most Chinese unicorns, but also belong in terms of performance, funding, market research, connectedness, experience and talent, and knowledge to the best global start-up ecosystems (Beijing #5, Shanghai #8, Shenzhen #23, Hangzhou #36). In 2021, only the Silicon Valley, New York City, London and Boston scored better in these indicators than Beijing (Startup Genome, 2022). Beijing is China\u2019s uncontested unicorn capital. Beijing is famous for tech, while Shenzhen is famous for being the China\u2019s Silicon Valley of hardware. Factors contributing to Beijing\u2019s unicorn success are multifold. Beijing\u2019s tech companies (JD.com, VIPKID, ByteDance, Meituan Dianping) are located in the Zhongguancun (\u4e2d\u5173\u6751)area (see Photo 4\u20136). Due to its proximity to Peking University and Tsinghua University, the tech companies have an easy access to the country\u2019s top talents. In the Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2022, Peking University and Tsinghua University were ranked as the best Chinese universities, but they also belong to the world\u2019s top 20 universities and share rank #16 (Times Higher Education, 2022).<\/p>\n

Photo 4<\/strong>\u2013<\/strong>6<\/strong>. Zhongguancun area and Zhongguancun Entrepreneurship Street in Beijing<\/p>\n

\"\" \"\" \"\"<\/p>\n

Photo credit<\/em>: Anna-Katharina Schaper (September 2019)<\/p>\n

The country\u2019s top universities are not only part of the ecosystem in terms of highly skilled talents, but they also offer acceleration, incubation and entrepreneurship education programs. Examples are Tsinghua\u2019s X-Lab and the Tsinghua SEM X-elerator (Tsinghua SEM-elerator, 2022; Tsinghua X-Lab, 2022). Additionally, Beijing\u2019s vibrant ecosystem can be characterized by its strong gras-roots entrepreneurship communities. For instance, Start-up Grind Beijing, She Loves Tech and Ladies Who Tech, offers lots of networking and entrepreneurship education opportunities in the country\u2019s unicorn capital. Lastly, Beijing offers an extensive number of venture capital funds and business angels. Between 2017-2021, Beijing\u2019s VC funds invested approximately USD 86 bn, which is well above the global city average of USD 4.5 bn (Start-up Genome, 2021).<\/p>\n

China\u2019s currently most valuable unicorn start-ups are ByteDance (140 bn USD), SHEIN (100 bn USD) and Xiaohongshu (20 bn USD) (see Table 1). The three companies are based in China\u2019s unicorn hubs and run businesses in different industries. Founded by Zhang Yiming in 2012, ByteDance is the most valuable unicorn start-up in the world. Headquartered in China\u2019s capital, ByteDance operates in the AI industry. Maybe you have not heard about ByteDance yet but use one of ByteDance\u2019s apps. If the TikTok app is on your phone, you are using the company\u2019s product without knowing it. SHEIN comes in on rank #2. The company engages in the field of e-commerce. Its business model has been widely criticized, for copycat clothing, unsustainable, cheap clothing, and its harsh labor conditions (Marwan, 2022). Xiaohongshu is an e-commerce company from Shanghai (Crunchbase, 2022). Xiaohongshu\u2019s co-founder is QU Miranda, a woman entrepreneur who achieved the self-made billionaire status in 2021 (Zamora, 2022). A more detailed analysis of Chinese unicorn companies can be found in a study by me and Prof. Doris Fischer (see Schaper and Fischer, 2021).<\/p>\n

Table 1<\/strong>. China\u2019s most valuable unicorn start-ups<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Rank<\/strong><\/td>\nUnicorn start-ups<\/strong><\/td>\nValuation (USD bn)<\/strong><\/td>\nIndustry<\/strong><\/td>\nCity<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
#1<\/td>\nByteDance<\/td>\n140<\/td>\nArtificial intelligence<\/td>\nBeijing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
#2<\/td>\nSHEIN<\/td>\n100<\/td>\nE-commerce<\/td>\nShenzhen<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
#3<\/td>\nXiaohongshu<\/td>\n20<\/td>\nE-commerce<\/td>\nShanghai<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
#4<\/td>\nYuanfudao<\/td>\n15.50<\/td>\nEdtech<\/td>\nBeijing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
#5<\/td>\nDJI Innovations<\/td>\n15<\/td>\nHardware<\/td>\nShenzhen<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
#6<\/td>\nYuanqi Senlin<\/td>\n15<\/td>\nConsumer and retail<\/td>\nBeijing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
#7<\/td>\nBitmain Technologies<\/td>\n12<\/td>\nHardware<\/td>\nBeijing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
#8<\/td>\nXingsheng Selected<\/td>\n12<\/td>\nE-commerce<\/td>\nChangsha<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
#9<\/td>\nZongMu Technology<\/td>\n11.40<\/td>\nAuto and transportation<\/td>\nShanghai<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
#10<\/td>\nWeilong<\/td>\n10.88<\/td>\nConsumer and retail<\/td>\nLuohe<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Source<\/em>: Own illustration based on data from CB Insights (October 21, 2022)<\/p>\n

Chinese female entrepreneurs: the story of zhang xin and mi cindy<\/h2>\n

Have you ever heard about ZHANG Xin (SOHO China), ZHOU Qunfei (Lens Technology), MI Cindy (VIP KID), and WU Yajun (Longfor Properties)? These entrepreneurs belong to the most successful entrepreneurs in the world, some of them even became self-made female billionaires. If you have not heard about their stories and successes, you are not alone. To illustrate the existing gender gap in entrepreneurship and conventional knowledge on Chinese female entrepreneurs, I would like to tell you about an exercise that I do with students in my classes. At the beginning of my classes on entrepreneurship, I ask students to brainstorm names of Chinese entrepreneurs they know. The names usually mentioned are MA Yun (Alibaba), MA Huateng (Tencent), LEI Jun (Baidu), LIU Qiangdong (JD.com), ZHANG Yiming (ByteDance), and LI Bin (Nio). After the brainstorming, we talk about the founders and the business models of the companies they run. After this, I draw the attention of the students to the gender of the respective founders. Once they realize that they predominantly have named male founders, many students feel puzzled and are eager to learn more about gender diversity in entrepreneurship. What does this activity tell us? Does a lack of awareness of Chinese female entrepreneurs imply that there are no female founders that we should know about?<\/p>\n

In 2021, nearly 50 percent of the world\u2019s self-made female billionaires were coming from China (Zamora, 2022). This means that according to the Forbes 2022 data, 101 women managed to create extremely successful businesses in the past years. The gender gap in entrepreneurship and a lack of awareness of female entrepreneurs cannot only be observed in China, but in countries all over the world. Additionally, data from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor show that in comparison to other countries, China has a comparatively high rate of female founders. For instance, the business ownership rate of females is 8.2 percent in China, and thus above the world\u2019s average. In this category, China ranks 18 out of 50 countries (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2020).<\/p>\n

To increase our knowledge on Chinese women entrepreneurs, you will learn in the following about the stories of two Chinese female founders. Both founded their business in Beijing, but in different periods of time. The first one is ZHANG Xin, the founder of SOHO China, who set up her business in the 1990s and belongs to the first generation of female founders in China. The other one is MI Cindy, she set up her business in the early 2010s and represents the new generation of China\u2019s female founders.<\/p>\n

If you are in Beijing and visit Sanlitun or other areas in the city, you will see many buildings of SOHO China. SOHO China is a real estate development and property investment company. The company was founded by ZHANG Xin (\u5f20\u6b23) and her husband and co-founder, PAN Shiyi in Beijing in 1995 (see Photo 7). Due to the vast number of real estate development projects, ZHANG Xin is renown as \u2018the woman who built Beijing\u2019. ZHANG Xin grew up in Beijing during the cultural revolution, at a time when creating such a big private business (that also went for IPO at the Hong Kong stock in 2007), was beyond what anyone could imagine. After China\u2019s opening-up, ZHANG Xin moved to Hong Kong and worked as a factory girl. Her work made it possible to buy a one-way ticket to England. Scholarships enabled her to pursue higher education at the University of Sussex (Economics) and Cambridge University (Development Economics). After graduating from Cambridge University, she worked at Goldman Sachs in London, before moving back to Beijing and to set up her real estate business with her husband in 1995 (Handley, 2017). The rest is history. Nowadays, she is one of the most successful self-made female billionaires in the world. Her story is typical for the first generation of founders that seized opportunities after China\u2019s opening. During that time, double-digit growth rates could be taken for granted. In November 2019, one of SOHO China\u2019s latest real estate development projects was officially opened: The SOHO Leeza tower (see Phot 8 and 9). It is located in Beijing\u2019s Fengtai district and contributes to the development of this new business district in Beijing. The SOHO Leeza tower was designed by Zaha Hadid and is one of her last architecture projects. It is a unique building, with the world\u2019s highest atrium (194.15 m) (see Photo 9) being at its center (Zaha Hadid Architects, 2022). The SOHO Leeza tower can be viewed as an image for the continuing success of ZHANG Xin\u2019s real estate empire.<\/p>\n

Photo 7\u20139<\/strong>. Leeza SOHO opening ceremony on November 19, 2019. ZHANG Xin (see in the center of the photo) and her husband and co-founder PAN Shiyi (second from left).<\/p>\n

\"\" \"\" \"\"<\/p>\n

Photo credit<\/em>: Anna-Katharina Schaper (November 2019)<\/p>\n

After learning about ZHANG Xin, we will turn to MI Wenjuan (\u7c73\u96ef\u5a1f), called MI Cindy. MI Cindy is the founder of VIP KID and belongs to the new generation of founders in China (see Photo 10 and 11). VIPKID is an education tech company founded in Beijing in 2013. The company started out to match native English teachers with young students in China. The virtual learning approach therefore provides individual and tailored learning solutions for students (VIPKID, 2022). MI won the EdTech Breakthrough Awards in 2020 and her company was named one of the country\u2019s most innovative companies in 2020 (Fast Company, 2020). However, MI\u2019s own individual education journey was not as smooth as you would think. She dropped out of high school in the 11th grade. Before setting up VIPKID in 2013, she co-founded an education company with her uncle (McCorvey, 2018).<\/p>\n

Photo 10\u201311.<\/strong> MI Cindy at the SheLovesTech Conference 2019 in Beijing.<\/p>\n

\"\" \"\"<\/p>\n

Photo credit<\/em>: Anna-Katharina Schaper (September 2019)<\/p>\n

Chinese parents want their children to graduate from the nation\u2019s best universities. The entrance to China\u2019s top nine universities (the C9 league), like Peking University or Tsinghua University can be compared to an admission to Ivy league universities. China\u2019s national university entrance exam, the so-called \u2018gaokao\u2019 can be literally translated to \u2018high exam\u2019. The score in this exam decides which universities students can enter, either a top-tier university, which promises after graduation a rather stable and bright future, or the admission to a lower-tier university, which implies less opportunity and hardness in the already tense labor market. However, the access to the top-tier universities is influenced by regional inequalities (Hamnett et al., 2019). Since the \u2018gaokao\u2019 is a defining stepstone in the lives of Chinese students, Chinese parents are willing to spend a lot of money to get their children prepared. With VIPKID, MI Cindy identified the enormous potential of the Chinese edtech market.<\/p>\n

The edtech sector benefited from the COVID-19 crisis since it offered digital education solutions. The revenue of the Chinese education tech market increased tremendously in comparison to pre-pandemic levels. From 2018 to 2020, the worth of China\u2019s edtech market grew from 22 to 48 bn USD (Shleifer and Kologrivaya, 2021). Additionally, the edtech industry raised ca. 7.5 bn USD in 2020 (Lee and Sheng, 2021). However, in 2021, XI Jinping categorized after-school tutoring services as a social problem (South China Morning Post, 2021). Linked to the importance of the \u2018gaokao\u2019, after-school tutoring services cause an unequal playing field for students from low-income families and make it more difficult for them to compete with students from high-income families for the admission to the country\u2019s best universities. Consequently, the Chinese government regulated the education tech market. Running a business in the edtech industry became more and more difficult since then. Because of the so-called edtech crackdown, the industry needed to react to the newly introduced policies and to adapt their business models. This also applies to VIPKID which now focuses on international markets and no longer provides its services in the domestic market (Reuters, 2021b). Nevertheless, China\u2019s edtech companies are successful. You can find them among China\u2019s Top 35 unicorns in terms of value: Yuanfudao (15.5 bn USD), VIP KID (4.5 bn USD), and Zuoyebang (3 bn USD) (CB Insights, 10\/21\/2022).<\/p>\n

Conclusion and traveling into the future<\/h2>\n

Since Chinese founders have created a plethora of successful businesses in the past decades, it is surprising that entrepreneurship in China is still an underexplored research field. So, why do we know so little about entrepreneurship activities and how it works in China? More research helps us understand how entrepreneurship works in different regional contexts around the world, particularly from a gender-aware perspective. This article provides an overview of entrepreneurship activities in China and demonstrates why studying entrepreneurship in the land of the pandas is worth the effort. However, ongoing COVID measures, lockdowns, and a zero-COVID strategy make it difficult for businesses to keep up with their performance. This also applies to the research community. Travel restrictions to China are still in place, which renders (field) research very difficult. Nevertheless, we need more researchers paying attention to what is going on in China and to contextualize entrepreneurship activities. Recent political developments and state intervention in the private sector make studying entrepreneurship in China even more timely and relevant.<\/p>\n

References<\/h2>\n